Share By Suzy Frisch
When Dr. Mark Friedberg and his team at RAND Corporation surveyed physicians about their job satisfaction in 2013, they were surprised that one area of discontent kept coming up: electronic health records.
Though doctors appreciate some aspects of using EHRs, the systems are also the culprit for much of their stress.
Sponsored by the American Medical Association and issued in the fall of 2013, the survey of physicians at 30 medical practices in six states confirmed what other researchers have recently reported about EHR-related stress. Electronic medical records chip away at doctors’ job satisfaction and compound their stress for many reasons, including piling onto their workload, eroding the quality of their care, and making their daily practice less efficient.
“Four of five doctors don’t want to go back to paper records, because there are advantages to having electronic records … But EHRs are a source of stress and frustration for physicians.”
“Four of five doctors don’t want to go back to paper records, because there are advantages to having electronic records. They really value the ability to retrieve patient information from another doctor in the practice or from home on the weekend,” says Friedberg, a health policy researcher at RAND.
“But EHRs are a source of stress and frustration for physicians. The big ones are usability and whether they match clinical workflow. They found they are trying to divide their attention between their patient and their computer.”
A major source of anxiety comes from EHRs’ messaging systems. Most lack a way to prioritize the scores of messages—from other doctors, patients, or insurance companies—that pour in during the workday. Doctors generally don’t have a staff person who goes through their messages, and they can’t tell which ones are urgent and which can wait.
Not being able to get access to a patient’s medical records from another institution is another frustration. Instead of quickly sharing files electronically, they must be faxed, which makes them unsearchable in an electronic record. It’s one of the key reasons many physicians invested in EHRs, and they are disappointed that the varied systems don’t talk to each other.
Less Time Saved
“Doctors also described their workday being longer, and that has to do with data entry. They might have dictated their notes previously or used a human transcriptionist, and now they are typing notes themselves or using dictation software, but it’s not accurate,” says Friedberg. “It’s not saving them time like they thought it would.”
A study published last fall in the Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association also found that EHRs heighten doctors’ stress. After surveying nearly 400 doctors and managers of 92 clinics, the researchers, led by Dr. Stewart Babbott, from the University of Kansas Medical Center, found that primary care physicians using EHRs with more functions report increased stress and less job satisfaction than doctors who use EHRs with lower functionality.
“Clinicians have limited time,” said Heather Haugen, corporate managing director of The Breakaway Group, a Xerox Company. She is co-author of “Beyond Implementation: A Prescription for Lasting EMR Adoption.”
“They respond well to training that can be accessed 24/7, and is presented in small, manageable chunks. They also prefer the convenience of individual, self-paced learning,” she said, referring to EHR training programs designed to lessen stress on the physician.
Too Much Information
The study highlights several reasons why physicians face mounting stress from EHRs. Several involved time pressure related to using the records. Though they appreciated the richness of patient data in EHRs, physicians have so much information they need to collect from patients during short office visits—including chronic disease management, health maintenance, quality measures, and other documentation. They find themselves racing through appointments to get through it all.
“Clinicians are often given more information than they need—resulting in information overload,” Haugen said. “While it is tempting to show off every technological bell and whistle in a new HIT [Health Information Technology] system, we urge clients to initially focus only on tasks required to develop proficiency (not mastery) for regular job performance.”
Another pressure point: Trying to communicate with patients, interact with them, assess them, and treat them, all while simultaneously engaging with the EHR to give it all of its requested information.
One possible solution: “Longer office visits to accommodate information overload,” particularly at sites that have fully implemented EHRs, the JAMIA study authors suggest.
As physicians get more accustomed to using EHRs, some of the stress might dissipate. But researchers from both studies believe highlighting areas of physician stress related to electronic records will give vendors a path to making them more usable—and less frustrating—for doctors.
(This article was originally published on HealthBiz Decoded, a Xerox-sponsored resource for providers, payers, employers and government agencies.)
Subscribe to our weekly newsletter to keep up with all of RealBusiness’ original stories.